Welcome to The Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads

Constitution Discussion


Burnt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Okay, I feel like people aren't reading this correctly.

Do you guys think "Members" means [HG]? because it doesn't, it means members of Hellsgamers Council

 

PART 1. FULL MEMBERSHIP – All HG Members currently listed on the HellsGamers roster.

 

Any member may choose to withdraw from the HellsGamers Council with a mandatory 2 week notice.

 

Membership = HG Member

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name=Paul :)' timestamp='1451699417' post='674085]

PART 1. FULL MEMBERSHIP – All HG Members currently listed on the HellsGamers roster.

 

Any member may choose to withdraw from the HellsGamers Council with a mandatory 2 week notice.

 

Membership = HG Member

 

No...

That is one of the requirements for being Member of Council.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No...

That is one of the requirements for being Member of Council.

 

All HG Members that have gone through the 60 day recruit process as well as official Member promotion. Members of HellsGamers are determined by being listed on the HellsGamers roster, being part of one of the 5 committees, and upholding the below requirements

 

This sets a precedent that it's all HG members unless a new topic was introduced specifically for council..

 

SECTION C. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBERSHIP

 

Membership of HG

 

 

 

---

 

Is this just an introduction to a new council part of HG?

Edited by Paul :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I'm reading from the last couple of posts, this thing needs to have someone go over it again and reword stuff. If "Members" means council and not [HG] then that makes a lot more sense and I would be totally okay with it then. Leadership definitely needs stricter guidelines; That's been something I've noted numerous times since I've been with HG and it's been the reason I've left twice now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, so this entire conversation we had about mandatory meetings were because we misread the poor wording? Well, I guess i'll just keep this post count then :3

Yes.

Though this doesn't make it any less hilarious, since in most meetings it was uM+ that didn't show up.

Edited by Icon315
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is still under construction so there is really no need to lash out at Homer for something you might not like. He hasn't finalized it yet, so just post your ideas and leave them.

They are discussing, simply that. As "leadership" you should know how member meetings and such go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when we had mandatory leadership meetings, there would be people still not attending the meetings. I wanna say there's about 50 leadership members total and about 400 probably even more members. the turnout would be so bad IF meetings were required of members. if that were to happen, we'd most likely see a lot of HG members leaving. this is a gaming community, not a government. Hopefully this isn't what Homer has planned. We'll see what happens but I'd like to see where it goes

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share