603rd ACS Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 1. Name: eMG l.a. 2. Steam Id: STEAM_0:1:13132257 3. Server: Dust2 Deathmatch 4. Reason: Wallhacking 5. Proof: http://zhost.hellsgamers.com/1/c4ce2091cbc3e11466c64f2f638c15e8.dem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandium Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 1. Name: eMG l.a.2. Steam Id: STEAM_0:1:13132257 3. Server: Dust2 Deathmatch 4. Reason: Wallhacking 5. Proof: http://zhost.hellsgamers.com/1/c4ce2091cbc3e11466c64f2f638c15e8.dem I hope this one is more conclusive than your last.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
603rd ACS Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 What do you mean by that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noc2RnaLxCrU Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 i've watched the demo couple of times i don't really think he's hacking at all. don't see any wall hax at all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 What do you mean by that? exactly what is written, google conclusive if you're unsure of the meaning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 So 603rd ACS are you the admin that keeps baning him? your in game name is "i hate myself" & admin name: "373Fancher" I don't see walls, here's his unban requests https://hellsgamers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13394 only ban someone if you have good poof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
603rd ACS Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 This is the first time I've banned anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 This is the first time I've banned anyone. Wrong. There's a whole page of bans from you. And here is two times that you banned this person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Thank you hobbes, i was actually doing that :-D so not only did you just lie to us, you banned the same person twice, oh and all your bans seem to be for a day that expired with no ban reports? anyone else think he needs a break from admin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slazenger Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Probably not good to lie out of your teeth when you're trapped in the corner. Thank you hobbes, i was actually doing that :-D so not only did you just lie to us, you banned the same person twice, oh and all your bans seem to be for a day that expired with no ban reports? anyone else think he needs a break from admin? I was doing the same thing as well...and I completely agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moto Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I talked to 603 in Vent, but, you know me, I tend to be too nice about crap once in a while... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 (edited) I talked to 603 in Vent, but, you know me, I tend to be too nice about crap once in a while... you're such a bort :-D edit* i checked about 90% of his bans and they're either listed as wallhack,aimbot, or multihack. he even banned a 5 digit for a day for "hacking". NONE OF THESE BANS HAVE REPORTS! I strongly suggest admin removal for the time being till he reads the rules Edited November 5, 2009 by Weeman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
603rd ACS Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 I've already talked to Yuliya (Moto?) about that. I've been on TDY since 16 Oct to Rammstein AB, and just got back this monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noc2RnaLxCrU Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Yea agree I feel like he's been banning this person for no reason we don't want to lose our players if there not guilty. Definate break from admin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 (edited) this will be left for the higher ups, i will close this thread so it doesnt become an attack thread. An upper staff may re-open to decide if the admin is to be punished or not. Edited November 5, 2009 by Weeman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandium Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 this will be left for the higher ups, i will close this thread so it doesnt become an attack thread. An upper staff may re-open to decide if the admin is to be punished or not. He probably doesn't need to be punished. I am sure the talk with Moto helped him understand the situation a bit better. He did post a demo right after the ban. Maybe just a better understanding of what cheating is would help. I don't think there is a reason for punishment this time though. And we prefer temp bans until the proof is supplied on possible cheats, and an ultimate decision is made. (so no wrong doing there either) Someone else can override that, but please explain why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moto Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 We talked about different things in regards to this and also mentioned that if someone IS hacking, we dont want the person gone for just one day -- permanent ban is wanted. We need the proof to do so and to show the player if he/she files an unban/abuse thread. He was reasonable and understanding throughout it all -- the initial in-game approach and speaking in Vent. Was happy with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts