Question?

[ExGBrian]

Can you say last reaction jump when theirs only 1 player left? So if he jumps hes the last player anyway and we can kill him?

[blackberry4511]

As far as i know, its a big fat no. If he is the last one technically you cant do it anymore. The point of Lr jump or etc is to get it down to the last 2 or 1 player left. (mostly)

[JessicaJoy]

The last reaction jump is a big no.

 

I have seen leads go 'first reaction jump" when there is 1 T left (say opinionated day, and the ones who don't play are in big cage and the ones who are playing are on top of big cage)

 

Basically, it is a tarp when they do first reaction, that is ok. last reaction with 1 T left, not ok.

[Scott]

Could have stopped there.

 

thats not really relevant to what brians asking...

 

and jailbreak is about playing games with the Ts, not trying to get them killed. if theres only one left, have him have a freeday!!

[LazaHorse]

I was agreeing with his answer, Mom. If you need, here's an essay about why it makes no sense as an order. GUARANTEED tl;dr:

 

For something to be considered "last," there must be something to precede it. I am the last of my family because everyone is older and were thus born "before." If he is first, he cannot therefore be last because there is nothing before. HOWEVER if he doesn't jump, he's conflicting with the normal perception of the game that whoever doesn't jump will most likely die. This creates a stupidly formed paradox that has no winning solution for the T, and thus makes no sense as a game. First reaction jump while one is alone is fine because if he jumps, he is first. He can choose to not jump as most would do in the normal perception of the game with more than one terrorist.

 

Like I said, tl;dr.

[racker16]

hmmm.... post was deleted so attempt 2. So No, like laz says theres only one t, so technically if he jumps he would be the first one to jump, and the last one to jump. In fact he would be the only one to jump so there would be no medium to compare him to.

Edited August 10, 2011 by racker16

[poison.ivy]

I was agreeing with his answer, Mom. If you need, here's an essay about why it makes no sense as an order. GUARANTEED tl;dr:

 

For something to be considered "last," there must be something to precede it. I am the last of my family because everyone is older and were thus born "before." If he is first, he cannot therefore be last because there is nothing before. HOWEVER if he doesn't jump, he's conflicting with the normal perception of the game that whoever doesn't jump will most likely die. This creates a stupidly formed paradox that has no winning solution for the T, and thus makes no sense as a game. First reaction jump while one is alone is fine because if he jumps, he is first. He can choose to not jump as most would do in the normal perception of the game with more than one terrorist.

 

Like I said, tl;dr.

 

Asian answer. ILY LAZ.

 

Also, doesn't this go along with no Last Reaction/First Reaction tarps like...Jewish Family Dinner...or Jehovah's witness?

 

Like JJoy and Blackberry said, the whole point of the game is to bring it down to 1/2 people at the least.

[Wolfman]

Last reaction jump for 1 T means he's fucked from the get go? If there is no possible way for him/her to win then that would obviously be a freekill. First Reaction jump for 1 T is hilarious though.

[Frostbite]

As far as I know, the answer is a no.

 

The point of last reaction is to get down to one/two people. Besides, what's the point of last reaction with one person? There'd be no way for him to win, because whatever he did he would lose. And, essentially, that'd be an FK.