JJK Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 (edited) walk Verb: Move at a regular and fairly slow pace by lifting and setting down each foot in turn, never having both feet off the ground at once. no jumping implied for crouch and walk... regardless if you were holding down the key while jumping Now if you are ordered to 'go to xxx' or to 'run to xxx' and lead fails to say 'no jumping' then sure jump however you want ...but delaying and detouring is auto-implied Edited June 8, 2012 by JJK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 okay, if they are at the top of cell stairs for instance and a walk order is given, are they allowed to jump down over the railing to the lower part ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJK Posted June 8, 2012 Author Share Posted June 8, 2012 (edited) ill play it safe and just stick to the definition 100% but a generous lead would let you jump if he wants Edited June 8, 2012 by JJK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 In other words... we no longer have to say no jumping with every order? Righteous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJK Posted June 8, 2012 Author Share Posted June 8, 2012 (edited) no jumping implied for crouch and walk... regardless if you were holding down the key while jumping Edited June 8, 2012 by JJK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccaincracker Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Same apply for crouching? Edit: herp derp phone didn't update replies.. Lol good thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimzy Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 I'd +k you for this thread jjk, good one even though it sucks cause I have this automatic urge to fail bhop somewhere :3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJK Posted June 8, 2012 Author Share Posted June 8, 2012 with the mic spams and nitpicking choas and cts losing most of the rounds... i think this will help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Headband)(EG) Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 I'd +k you for this thread jjk, I do not know what this +k is that you speak of can you clarify this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prayuer Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 We going to imply "Freeze upon arrival" too? Otherwise I could jump once getting there because I'm no longer required to be "walking" or "crouching"... (inb4 FK)... And now we have to deal with the spam "No jumping is implied in all crouch and walk orders" because the rule is NOT something players will (or should) expect and it is not posted anywhere they will see it. And then all the chat spam about FKing because you're making a Significant gameplay change through last minute forum post. Quit trying to fix stupid... it can't be done. Bad leads will find a way to fail, simple. Baiting causes a large number of round fails, why not over react to that and send any CT that gets knifed to electric chair... And if you want to fix the win/loss ratio, just get rid of LR... T's get a lot of "wins" because of LR... CTs should make it to LR because lead gave clear and consise orders leading the T's to play games... Not because he was able to kill off most of them with traps and implied orders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWSOME WAFFLES Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Finally! Good rule! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 And if you want to fix the win/loss ratio, just get rid of LR... T's get a lot of "wins" because of LR... CTs should make it to LR because lead gave clear and consise orders leading the T's to play games... Not because he was able to kill off most of them with traps and implied orders. No one has said (not from HG leadership at least) that the literal server win-loss ratio is a concern. It's always been like that, no one minds. What we worry about is the "get to LR" vs. "all CTs die before LR" ratio. While it's not realistically quantifiable (unless BonBon is Jesus), you can probably guess it's also very one-sided toward Ts. Making no jumping implied for these "slower" versions of moving helps to remove the spam of people saying "you didn't say no jumping" and also allows them to be more preventative against rebelling. Ts can no longer BHop away when they hear crouch/jump and CTs will no longer be hesitant to shoot when they see that (did he say no jumping???). In other words, it gets rid of a lot of unnecessary nitpicking and makes the CTs job that much easier to NOT act like idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonepostal3000 Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Makes sense now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabe Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 I approve, it's going to take a while to get use to while leading, but, we'll all get use to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJK Posted June 8, 2012 Author Share Posted June 8, 2012 We going to imply "Freeze upon arrival" too? Otherwise I could jump once getting there because I'm no longer required to be "walking" or "crouching"... (inb4 FK)... And now we have to deal with the spam "No jumping is implied in all crouch and walk orders" because the rule is NOT something players will (or should) expect and it is not posted anywhere they will see it. And then all the chat spam about FKing because you're making a Significant gameplay change through last minute forum post. Quit trying to fix stupid... it can't be done. Bad leads will find a way to fail, simple. Baiting causes a large number of round fails, why not over react to that and send any CT that gets knifed to electric chair... And if you want to fix the win/loss ratio, just get rid of LR... T's get a lot of "wins" because of LR... CTs should make it to LR because lead gave clear and consise orders leading the T's to play games... Not because he was able to kill off most of them with traps and implied orders. I have always viewed your input over most. but if you take things too personal i might change that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Consuela Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Q: does this include "yumping"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonbon Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Damn. That is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Constantin Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 most people know its implied, but do it just to see if they can do it and not get caught. #Thug life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vorderyx Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 damn i liked the jumping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
envisioN . Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Good new rule. It's tiresome and annoying to have to say "no jumping" after EVERY SINGLE order. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poohunter Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 We really have to tell some people about how it's okay when running because of of them just don't get it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.