60Seconds Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Anyone who causes shit will have their mother sodomized by Barney the dinosaur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttaM Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Let's ask the preteens in HG their political opinion. Where is the option to vote for Gambino? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Let's ask the preteens in HG their political opinion. Where is the option to vote for Gambino? Gambino-Brown '16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravity Kitteh Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 I dont know who these people are.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeman Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Let's ask the preteens in HG their political opinion. Where is the option to vote for Gambino? Gambino doesn't care about you! Church '12! End the corruption! Let the people speak! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccaincracker Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Gambino doesn't care about you! Church '12! End the corruption! Let the people speak! I'm here to expose your attitude. also, #nevodka for leadership Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nipple Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 tbh i think we should look at the ranger from the north for a possible candidate... he might be able to unite all of middle earth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 SWAT '12 - Stick it to the man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevodka Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 SWAT '12 - Stick it to the man. Ashley '12 - Stick it to the man-girl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhyYouNoDie? Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Who The Fuck Are These People Besides Mitt And Obama? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimzy Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Let's ask the preteens in HG their political opinion. Where is the option to vote for Gambino? I know he'd have my vote. unless if you were a candidate, duhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevodka Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 WhoThe Fuck Are These People Besides Mitt And Obama? They're called independents and they take votes away from the dem/gop candidates depending on which party's platform they're more closely associated with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BranHorse Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 I am a Constitutionalist. Took a polsci class last semester and my professor was a man of the constitution and showed how every branch of government now does things that they are not supposed to do especially the executive branch. Can go on forever and laz can do a witty response and billy can share his opinion Anyways in the 2008 presidential election almost 125 million voters went to the ballots (57%). Two years later in the mid term election, only 90 million voters went to the ballots(38%). People need to understand the only way to get things changed for your state/hometown/family is to go and vote during the mid term elections. Sure the president is important, but he is not the one representing you. If your mad that the feds are regulating how much water your getting (huge issue in central cali), then go and vote the person who is limiting your water out of office. If gun control is an issue in your city then vote your rep out and make a change. These things have major effects on the economy. Things for you, your family and communities can all be better if you vote every two years...not once every four. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttaM Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I am a Constitutionalist. Took a polsci class last semester and my professor was a man of the constitution and showed how every branch of government now does things that they are not supposed to do especially the executive branch. Can go on forever and laz can do a witty response and billy can share his opinion Anyways in the 2008 presidential election almost 125 million voters went to the ballots (57%). Two years later in the mid term election, only 90 million voters went to the ballots(38%). People need to understand the only way to get things changed for your state/hometown/family is to go and vote during the mid term elections. Sure the president is important, but he is not the one representing you. If your mad that the feds are regulating how much water your getting (huge issue in central cali), then go and vote the person who is limiting your water out of office. If gun control is an issue in your city then vote your rep out and make a change. These things have major effects on the economy. Things for you, your family and communities can all be better if you vote every two years...not once every four. I took a political science class, please listen to my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Ron Paul was not included in this poll. Please remake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Ron Paul was not included in this poll. Please remake. You also can't vote for him. GW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 You also can't vote for him. GW! i rite in gooby den. vic prez is acualy dolan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkMonotone Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I'm a Centrist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
envisioN . Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I find it funny that Romney said in the debate that he would not approve any tax cuts that would increase the deficit, but is still promising to cut taxes for the upper class. He doesn't seem to understand that cutting taxes for the upper class WILL increase the deficit, so there is no way that he could do both things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 He doesn't seem to understand that cutting taxes for the upper class WILL increase the deficit, so there is no way that he could do both things. 1. He's changed his position on upper-class taxes. He's no longer promising cuts and is now promising instead reduced subsidies and breaks for upper-class businessmen and their businesses. 2. You can do both at the same time. Lowering taxes does not automatically mean you begin to draw a deficit. It simply means you have to either make revenue elsewhere or cut expenditures. He suggested both during the debate. 3. I just needed a 3rd point because Romney talks in 3s. #JesusTalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhataWackaMonk Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Let's ask the preteens in HG their political opinion. Mitt Romney said he would increase jobs, and lay off unnecessary money spenders (Oxymoron). The first thing he would lay off is PBS, Big Bird...all that stuff. HE GONNA KILL ELMO. Right there; Obama wins...easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
envisioN . Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 1. He's changed his position on upper-class taxes. He's no longer promising cuts and is now promising instead reduced subsidies and breaks for upper-class businessmen and their businesses. 2. You can do both at the same time. Lowering taxes does not automatically mean you begin to draw a deficit. It simply means you have to either make revenue elsewhere or cut expenditures. He suggested both during the debate. 3. I just needed a 3rd point because Romney talks in 3s. #JesusTalk So he is going to not cut taxes on the upper class, give them less money in subsidies, AND reduce the number of tax breaks on them? I think that unless you cut something big (like half of Medicare/aid) its going to be hard to make revenue elsewhere without increasing taxes. And no one will support cutting a huge chunk out of Medicare/aid because old people are a huge majority of the Republican vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
60Seconds Posted October 6, 2012 Author Share Posted October 6, 2012 1. He's changed his position on upper-class taxes. He's no longer promising cuts and is now promising instead reduced subsidies and breaks for upper-class businessmen and their businesses. 2. You can do both at the same time. Lowering taxes does not automatically mean you begin to draw a deficit. It simply means you have to either make revenue elsewhere or cut expenditures. He suggested both during the debate. 3. I just needed a 3rd point because Romney talks in 3s. #JesusTalk Except that he won't specify what cuts, mainly because there aren't enough that he can cut to reduce the deficit. He wants to cut taxes for wealthy people and reduce the deficit by taking away welfare from poor people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccaincracker Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Anyone who causes shit will have their mother sodomized by Barney the dinosaur. Did you guys miss this part, or would you like it to happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajolt Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I would like to have mom sodimized by Barney. OH ME FIRST ME FIRST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.