Score Multipliers For Winning Maps

[Kirbs]

So if a multiplier for winning a map is set to 3x, someone with a score of 200 would earn 400 points for winning the map, and someone with a score of 2000 would earn 4000 points for winning the map. (Note that I say score multiplier instead of point multiplier)

 

 

The score multipliers are calculated using the formula above, unfortunately, I only know how to graph it and not actually translate it into something that can run in the game's code. However, here are what some of the numbers look like using the formula:

 

Win Rate | Score Multiplier

 

1% 7.089x

 

2% 5.025x

 

4% 3.571x

 

5% 3.203x

 

10% 2.294x

 

20% 1.667x

 

25% 1.512

 

50% 1.155x

 

75% 1.033x

 

90% 1.005x

 

100% 1x

 

I believe this will encourage players to try harder in maps, as I usually see players just sitting around doing nothing and being lazy. Simply put, if you don't help, you earn no points for winning, and if you help out a lot, you earn LOADS of points for winning.

Edited February 25, 2017 by Kirbs

[EngineTrap]

I would say this sound cool, but this sounds to me more like an excuse to make even more points. lmao

 

BUT WHAT DO I KNOW? IM JUST A DERGUN

>w<

Edited February 25, 2017 by Aeris

[Lunar]

I would say this sound cool, but this sounds to me more like an excuse to make even more points. lmao

Pointwhores

[iProbie]

great idea, but introduce an upper limit.

 

many of these whores have more than 100,000 points to their names.

 

and then the exponential effect kicks in and suddenly someone starting at 200 points can end up with 6400 points by just winning 4 times on 10% winrate maps.

[Ryze]

Its an interesting idea but the multiplier should only kick in at something below a 15-20% win rate (even that might be too high) and be capped at a max 2x multiplier. Anything more will result in too much pointwhoring.