LazaHorse Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Fact of the matter is... Prosecutors couldn't place her at the crime scene because THERE WAS NO CRIME SCENE! All these things prove she's a terrible mother, but none of them prove she's a murderer. I've googled things like the content of Anthrax and how to construct a particle bomb plenty of times. Why? Because I'm a Physics student and those things interest me. Doesn't mean I'm a terrorist. The trial proved that Casey Anthony's lawyers are retarded and can't keep a defense longer than 2 hours. It proved that she's a terrible mother who deserves to rot in jail BECAUSE she "let" this happen to her daughter. It proved that the court justice system has too many loopholes to get everyone who we think we should probably get. However, it also proved that unless the prosecution can pull up enough evidence... you can get away with whatever you want. I do find it funny that apparently a 2-year-old can commit suicide though. Like... really? *EDIT* This thread is now about Faithless's avatar... Those are Koreans... not Japanese kids... I am so disappoint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r3dm0nd Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I love oatmeal and chocolate milk. But the thing that makes me sick about this even more is now that she's been found not guilty, she will get a book deal, and most likely a movie about it and she basically profits from it. Just like O.J. Simpson and his If I Did It book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttaM Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I do find it funny that apparently a 2-year-old can commit suicide though. Like... really? YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE GOING THROUGH. YOU DON'T REMEMBER WHAT IT'S LIKE BEING 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttaM Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I can't wait until the jurors all write books on how they know she was guilty just couldn't prove it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F4ithl3ss Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE GOING THROUGH. YOU DON'T REMEMBER WHAT IT'S LIKE BEING 2 YEAH OATMEAL AND CHCOLATE MILK! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F4ithl3ss Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I can't wait until the jurors all write books on how they know she was guilty just couldn't prove it. YEAH THEN THEY GO EAT OATMEAL AND CHOCOLATE MILK! WHAT A BUNCH OF BULLSHIT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 When Staff and Council be double postin... that's when you know you're on some srs bzns... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F4ithl3ss Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 When Staff and Council be double postin... that's when you know you're on some srs bzns... PROLLY JUST HAD TOO MUCH OATMEAL AND CHOCOLATE MILK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattThePanda Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 PROLLY JUST HAD TOO MUCH OATMEAL AND CHOCOLATE MILK he did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccaincracker Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Hey i heard there was chocolate milk in this thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattThePanda Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Hey i heard there was chocolate milk in this thread AND OATMEAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabbit Posted July 6, 2011 Author Share Posted July 6, 2011 It seemed like you were on the side with "the jury is wrong, she needs to be jailed." What I'm saying is the jury made their decision and that is how the system works, we have to accept that because that is in fact our system. Perhaps saying there's not enough evidence is the wrong term... let me go back to my quarters to find the right one. Although it's funny that you bring up that she lied and all that good stuff, because well, she was convicted of doing that By raising enough "reasonable doubt" Item 1: The body was in the trunk of her car for a week! Doubt Planted: Experts testified to there being no proof of there being a body in the car Item 2: She googled "how to make cloroform"! Doubt Planted: Casey's mother testified it was her, and not Casey that did that search Item 3: She didn't report her daughter missing for a month! Doubt Planted: Testimony given on how Casey was "forced" to do a cover up. As a side note: this is a charge she was found guilty of. Not saying the doubt was valid, just how it was raised, and all you need a just a bit of "reasonable doubt", and you get a not guilty verdict It looks so simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluHorse Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 no proof of a body? how about the smell. the smell of a rotting human body is an extremely distinct smell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike is Fr3sh Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 i herd there was oatmeal and chocolate milk in this thread. [video=youtube;pg9x-5oS9Z0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg9x-5oS9Z0 also, verdict was horseshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FDR Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 The jury did it's job and made their verdict. That's all that matter. If she kills another person, then that's going to be on their conscience, not anyone else's Also, I like how we got chocolate milk and oatmeal into a thread about the Casey Anthony trial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PedalBin Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I have only read this to read about Chocolate milk and Oatmeal. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDevil6193 Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 This thread is now about OaTmEaL aNd ChOcOlAtE mIlK yes yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabbit Posted July 6, 2011 Author Share Posted July 6, 2011 my thread just crashed into a Oatmeal and chocolate Milk cake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weevil Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Wasnt she only charged with filing a flase police report? and thats just a misdemeanor right? i feel she was guilty of neglect/abuse and murder, but as stated earlier there is not enough spunk for a conviction =| Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabbit Posted July 6, 2011 Author Share Posted July 6, 2011 Wasnt she only charged with filing a flase police report? and thats just a misdemeanor right? i feel she was guilty of neglect/abuse and murder, but as stated earlier there is not enough spunk for a conviction =| WELL, HER DAUGHTER WAS MISSING FOR 31 DAYS, WHILE SHE WAS GOING OUT TO PARTY'S. is not that a neglect/abuse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurosaki Ichigo Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 See, I don't get this. Why wasn't the jury smart enough to realize that she killed her daughter... I mean, if one of my cousins drowned in a pool, I wouldn't let him/her just die, I would call 911 as soon as it happened, not wait 31 days and go out and party and pretend that nothing happened. And what gets to me is that her own mother lied for her daughters sake. I just dont get the justice system these days, I really don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabbit Posted July 6, 2011 Author Share Posted July 6, 2011 See, I don't get this. Why wasn't the jury smart enough to realize that she killed her daughter... I mean, if one of my cousins drowned in a pool, I wouldn't let him/her just die, I would call 911 as soon as it happened, not wait 31 days and go out and party and pretend that nothing happened. And what gets to me is that her own mother lied for her daughters sake. I just dont get the justice system these days, I really don't. i guess it was a DOUBT for the Jury, that she knew her daughter was dead that's why she went to party for 31 days while her daughter was missing. Now u can kill anybody, then hide that person and go party, then when u get caught, just say that it was an accident and u were afraid to report it, the Jury will take this as a Doubt, so the case is close.... u go free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazaHorse Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 ... Let's stop arguing about whether or not she killed her daughter. I'm PRETTY SURE most of America is convinced she did. However, under the American justice system, one is innocent until PROVEN guilty. The prosecution could not PROVE she killed her kid, so she could not be found guilty of doing so. They lacked a fully-defined cause of death though their explanation makes complete and convincing sense. They lacked a crime scene though they know where the body was located post-mortem. They lacked a definitive time of death though they gave some pretty well-calculated estimates in my judgement. ALL of these "most likelys means only one thing in our justice system: not guilty. Had she been FOUND guilty, the appeal's process would've been a walk in the park for her attorneys. It's stupid that American courts have ALL THESE OUTS for people on trial... but they're there for a reason. 30 years ago, people were put on death row for as much as slapping a woman in the park. Is it more "fair?" Sure... Do SOME people get off because of it... you bet cha. tl;dr - Go take a class in criminal law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabbit Posted July 6, 2011 Author Share Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) ... Let's stop arguing about whether or not she killed her daughter. I'm PRETTY SURE most of America is convinced she did. However, under the American justice system, one is innocent until PROVEN guilty. The prosecution could not PROVE she killed her kid, so she could not be found guilty of doing so. They lacked a fully-defined cause of death though their explanation makes complete and convincing sense. They lacked a crime scene though they know where the body was located post-mortem. They lacked a definitive time of death though they gave some pretty well-calculated estimates in my judgement. ALL of these "most likelys means only one thing in our justice system: not guilty. Had she been FOUND guilty, the appeal's process would've been a walk in the park for her attorneys. It's stupid that American courts have ALL THESE OUTS for people on trial... but they're there for a reason. 30 years ago, people were put on death row for as much as slapping a woman in the park. Is it more "fair?" Sure... Do SOME people get off because of it... you bet cha. tl;dr - Go take a class in criminal law. The system is not perfect. cloroform--baby bumpers in sacks--baby blanket in sacks--body smell in her car--duct tape--baby in woods- 100 lies by her mother. the jury was not smart enough to connect the dots The obvious problem with these jurors is as follows: 1. Low IQ: I would guess the average IQ is 90. 2. They watched too much television over the years and thought forensic evidence was the only kind of evidence, when most cases are in fact, circumstantial 3. They thought they were being "intellectual" by following what they thought what "reasonable doubt" when in fact they were proving how uneducated they are (as a group) 4. They did not know what reasonable doubt meant (perhaps the prosecution did not explain it) The fact is, these jurors are idiots--plain and simple. Here is a point of fact for all of you would be criminal investigators out there. Murder in the FIRST means premeditation. They over charged her. A more responsible and certain to be convicted charge would have been negligent homicide. State could NOT prove its case. Pretty simple They could have opted to render a deadlocked decision whereupon the trial would have been repeated w/another jury. Edited July 6, 2011 by Wabbit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I'm late. Oh, well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.